Misconceptions and Misrepresentations: A Scholarly Response to Orientalist Criticism of the Seerah

Abstract

The life and character of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) have been the subject of intense scrutiny by Western Orientalists, many of whom have approached the Seerah with deep-seated biases and preconceived notions. This article explores the recurring themes in Orientalist critiques, particularly their objections to the Prophet’s (ﷺ) marital life, his role as a statesman, and the expansion of Islam. The study highlights the historical roots of these critiques, tracing them from early Christian polemics to modern academic discourse. Additionally, it examines the impact of Crusades, colonialism, and contemporary Islamophobia in shaping these perspectives. By analyzing primary Orientalist sources and their rebuttals by Muslim scholars, this paper aims to present a balanced and scholarly response to these criticisms. The research underscores the importance of addressing such misconceptions through authentic Islamic scholarship, interfaith dialogue, and media engagement. Ultimately, it advocates for a more nuanced and objective study of the Seerah, free from ideological distortions and historical prejudices.

Keywords: seerah, Orientalist, Criticism, Islamophobia, Islamic teachings.